ISO 16890 vs ASHRAE 52.2: What Is the Difference?

Share:

Table of Contents

ISO 16890 and ASHRAE 52.2 are both used to evaluate air-cleaning devices for general ventilation. However, they use different classification systems, test procedures and calculation methods.

ISO 16890 reports ISO Coarse, ePM10, ePM2.5 and ePM1 classifications. ASHRAE 52.2 reports a Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value, or MERV.

There is no exact conversion between an ISO ePM classification and a MERV rating. Manufacturers supplying different markets may therefore need to test the same product according to both standards.

Comparison at a Glance

ItemISO 16890ASHRAE 52.2
Primary classificationISO Coarse, ePM10, ePM2.5, ePM1MERV
Typical market useInternational marketsNorth American market
Efficiency basisFractional efficiency processed using standardized PM distributionsParticle-size removal efficiency in defined size ranges
ConditioningComplete-filter conditioning according to ISO 16890-4Procedures defined by ASHRAE 52.2 and its applicable appendices
Dust loadingSeparate gravimetric and resistance test under ISO 16890-3Part of the prescribed ASHRAE test sequence
Main outputePM group and reported percentageMERV and particle-size efficiency data

How ISO 16890 Classifies Filters

ISO 16890 measures fractional efficiency across a range of particle sizes. The resulting initial and conditioned efficiency curves are processed using standardized reference particle-size distributions.

The calculated results determine whether the filter qualifies as:

  • ISO ePM1
  • ISO ePM2.5
  • ISO ePM10
  • ISO Coarse

An ISO ePM result provides a standardized basis for comparing filters. It is not a direct measurement of performance against every real atmospheric aerosol.

ISO 16890 also includes a dust-loading method for measuring gravimetric efficiency and resistance versus captured dust mass. This is a separate performance test and does not determine the ePM classification.

How ASHRAE 52.2 Assigns MERV

ASHRAE 52.2 evaluates removal efficiency as a function of particle size. Particle-size efficiency data are grouped into three ranges:

  • E1: 0.3–1.0 µm
  • E2: 1.0–3.0 µm
  • E3: 3.0–10 µm

The test procedure evaluates particle-removal performance and airflow resistance according to the prescribed sequence. The applicable efficiency results are then used to determine the MERV rating.

Because MERV and ePM are calculated differently, statements such as “MERV 13 equals ePM2.5” should not be used as formal conversions. Approximate comparison charts may be useful for general discussion, but they cannot replace testing under the standard required by the customer.

Why the Results Cannot Be Directly Converted

The two standards differ in:

  • Test aerosol
  • Particle-size channels and grouping
  • Conditioning procedure
  • Dust-loading procedure
  • Classification calculation
  • Test sequence
  • Reporting requirements

A filter may perform strongly under both standards, but the result from one method cannot be used to claim compliance with the other.

Airflow must also be considered. Efficiency and pressure drop measured at different airflow rates are not directly comparable.

Which Standard Should a Manufacturer Use?

Use the standard required by the customer, contract or target market.

ISO 16890 is normally selected when customers require an ISO ePM or ISO Coarse classification. ASHRAE 52.2 is normally selected when the market requires MERV.

Manufacturers supplying both international and North American customers may need a test platform configured for both methods. Sharing the same duct, fan and pressure-measurement system is possible, but the aerosol generation, conditioning, loading, software and reporting procedures must support each standard separately.

Information Needed Before Selecting Equipment

Before configuring a test system, define:

  1. Required standard and edition
  2. Filter type and maximum dimensions
  3. Rated airflow and pressure-drop range
  4. Target ISO ePM group or MERV rating
  5. Required conditioning and dust-loading procedures
  6. Daily or weekly testing volume
  7. Product-development, classification or production-QC purpose
  8. Calibration and report requirements

SCPUR provides configurable general ventilation filter test systems for ISO 16890 and ASHRAE 52.2 applications. Each system is configured according to the required test scope rather than relying on an approximate conversion between the two standards.

ISO 16890

Get in Touch

Before You Go...

Unsure which international standard applies to your project? Speak with our senior engineers for a personalized technical assessment based on our 10-year industry expertise.

*We respect your confidentiality and all information is protected.

Validate Your Quality with Global Standard Testing Systems

Our experts are ready to engineer a custom solution for you. Tell us about your project, and let’s verify your quality with precision and speed.

Custom R&D & Tailored Solutions

Custom R&D & Tailored Solutions

Compliance with Global Standards

Compliance with Global Standards

100% Self developed Software System

100% Self-developed Software System

Remote Calibration & Global Support

Remote Calibration & Global Support

Contact Us

*We respect your confidentiality and all information is protected.