ISO 16890 przeciwko ASHRAE 52.2: Jaka jest różnica?

Udział:

Spis treści

ISO 16890 i ASHRAE 52.2 are both used to evaluate air-cleaning devices for general ventilation. Jednakże, they use different classification systems, test procedures and calculation methods.

ISO 16890 reports ISO Coarse, ePM10, ePM2.5 and ePM1 classifications. ASHRAE 52.2 reports a Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value, or MERV.

There is no exact conversion between an ISO ePM classification and a MERV rating. Manufacturers supplying different markets may therefore need to test the same product according to both standards.

Porównanie w skrócie

ItemISO 16890ASHRAE 52.2
Primary classificationISO Coarse, ePM10, ePM2.5, ePM1MERV
Typical market useInternational marketsNorth American market
Podstawa efektywnościFractional efficiency processed using standardized PM distributionsParticle-size removal efficiency in defined size ranges
KondycjonowanieComplete-filter conditioning according to ISO 16890-4Procedures defined by ASHRAE 52.2 and its applicable appendices
Ładowanie pyłuSeparate gravimetric and resistance test under ISO 16890-3Part of the prescribed ASHRAE test sequence
Main outputePM group and reported percentageDane dotyczące wydajności MERV i wielkości cząstek

Jak ISO 16890 Classifies Filters

ISO 16890 measures fractional efficiency across a range of particle sizes. The resulting initial and conditioned efficiency curves are processed using standardized reference particle-size distributions.

The calculated results determine whether the filter qualifies as:

  • ISOePM1
  • ISO ePM2.5
  • ISOePM10
  • ISO Coarse

An ISO ePM result provides a standardized basis for comparing filters. It is not a direct measurement of performance against every real atmospheric aerosol.

ISO 16890 also includes a dust-loading method for measuring gravimetric efficiency and resistance versus captured dust mass. This is a separate performance test and does not determine the ePM classification.

How ASHRAE 52.2 Assigns MERV

ASHRAE 52.2 evaluates removal efficiency as a function of particle size. Particle-size efficiency data are grouped into three ranges:

  • E1: 0.3–1.0 µm
  • E2: 1.0–3.0 µm
  • E3: 3.0–10 µm

The test procedure evaluates particle-removal performance and airflow resistance according to the prescribed sequence. The applicable efficiency results are then used to determine the MERV rating.

Because MERV and ePM are calculated differently, statements such as “MERV 13 equals ePM2.5” should not be used as formal conversions. Approximate comparison charts may be useful for general discussion, but they cannot replace testing under the standard required by the customer.

Why the Results Cannot Be Directly Converted

The two standards differ in:

  • Testuj aerozol
  • Particle-size channels and grouping
  • Conditioning procedure
  • Dust-loading procedure
  • Classification calculation
  • Test sequence
  • Reporting requirements

A filter may perform strongly under both standards, but the result from one method cannot be used to claim compliance with the other.

Airflow must also be considered. Efficiency and pressure drop measured at different airflow rates are not directly comparable.

Which Standard Should a Manufacturer Use?

Use the standard required by the customer, contract or target market.

ISO 16890 is normally selected when customers require an ISO ePM or ISO Coarse classification. ASHRAE 52.2 is normally selected when the market requires MERV.

Manufacturers supplying both international and North American customers may need a test platform configured for both methods. Sharing the same duct, fan and pressure-measurement system is possible, but the aerosol generation, kondycjonowanie, załadunek, software and reporting procedures must support each standard separately.

Information Needed Before Selecting Equipment

Before configuring a test system, określić:

  1. Required standard and edition
  2. Filter type and maximum dimensions
  3. Rated airflow and pressure-drop range
  4. Target ISO ePM group or MERV rating
  5. Required conditioning and dust-loading procedures
  6. Daily or weekly testing volume
  7. Product-development, classification or production-QC purpose
  8. Calibration and report requirements

SCPUR provides configurable general ventilation filter test systems for ISO 16890 i ASHRAE 52.2 aplikacje. Each system is configured according to the required test scope rather than relying on an approximate conversion between the two standards.

ISO 16890

Skontaktuj się

Zanim odejdziesz...

Nie masz pewności, który międzynarodowy standard ma zastosowanie do Twojego projektu? Porozmawiaj z naszymi starszymi inżynierami, aby uzyskać spersonalizowaną ocenę techniczną opartą na naszym 10-letnim doświadczeniu branżowym.

*Szanujemy Twoją poufność i wszystkie informacje są chronione.

Potwierdź swoją jakość za pomocą globalnych standardowych systemów testowych

Nasi eksperci są gotowi zaprojektować dla Ciebie niestandardowe rozwiązanie. Opowiedz nam o swoim projekcie, i zweryfikujmy Twoją jakość z precyzją i szybkością.

Niestandardowe r&D & Rozwiązania szyte na miarę

Niestandardowe r&D & Rozwiązania szyte na miarę

Zgodność ze światowymi standardami

Zgodność ze światowymi standardami

100% Samodzielnie opracowany system oprogramowania

100% Samodzielnie opracowany system oprogramowania

Zdalna kalibracja & Globalne wsparcie

Zdalna kalibracja & Globalne wsparcie

Skontaktuj się z nami

*Szanujemy Twoją poufność i wszystkie informacje są chronione.

This page has been automatically translated from the English original for convenience. Product models, standards, numerical values and technical limits should be verified against the English version. Please contact SCPUR for project-specific confirmation.